(Back)
J.A.I.L. News Journal
September 28, 2003
J.A.I.L. Absolutely Unique
(By Ron Branson, Author/Founder)
"I believe trial by jury is the
only anchor yet imagined by man which can hold a government to the
principles of its constitution." - Thomas Jefferson
Perhaps no man influenced the
infrastructure of the foundations of our new experiment known as a
Constitutional Republic in America more so than did Thomas Jefferson.
American history is rife with quotes of him, the above being no
exception. Jefferson has received praise from all walks of life, and
statues have been erected to him, including the Jefferson Memorial in
Washington, D.C. There are even those who proclaim themselves to be "Jeffersonians."
After the order of Thomas Jefferson,
and our other Founding Fathers, two-hundred and nineteen years later,
(April, 1995), J.A.I.L. ("Judicial Accountability & Integrity
Legislation") has come into existence on the American scene. While not
yet recognized for its full value, it is as important as our original
Constitution itself.
Now while some of you are picking
yourself up from the floor where you have been laying and holding your
chest while gasping for air, let me explain. There is absolutely no
competition between the U.S. Constitution and J.A.I.L., for neither can
be complete without the other. I know some of you are saying, "These are
hard words," while others murmur "Treason," noting that our country has
existed for over 200 years without the existence of J.A.I.L., and so we
have.
But the fact remains, unless you have
been living on another planet, that our Constitution, after 200 years of
existence, has been reduced to just a piece of paper given political lip
service, cited as authority only when it serves one's political agenda.
All government officials, in theory, give solemn oath to it, pledging to
uphold and defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic, while
few of these people have ever read it in their life, and even fewer
understand it.
Thomas Jefferson said, "Let no more be
heard of confidence in men, but rather bind them down by the chains of
the Constitution." Most politicians accept the idea, as adopted by many
judges in our courts today, that our Constitution was intended by our
Founding Fathers to be rubberized, and those links of "chains to bind
them down," spoken of by Thomas Jefferson, are made of elastic.
In the quote of Thomas Jefferson above, "I
believe trial by jury is the only anchor yet imagined by man which can
hold a government to the principles of its constitution," we
note that the intent of Jefferson's words was holding government to the
principles of the Constitution. He said, "I believe trial by jury is the
only anchor yet imagined by man, and in 1776, he
was correct. But then came along J.A.I.L. two centuries later as "another
anchor imagined by man to hold government to the principles of the
Constitution!"
In the days of Thomas Jefferson, he
had a limited knowledge of options, and based thereon, he determined
that a trial by jury was the only anchor imagined by man to hold
government to the principles of the Constitution. Had Thomas Jefferson
then been enlightened to the concept of J.A.I.L., notwithstanding its
current title, history would doubtless record Thomas Jefferson as the
author of J.A.I.L.
In fact, even in his day, Thomas
Jefferson, disappointed in the lack of a provision in our current
Constitution, was searching for some Constitutional measure, such
as J.A.I.L., that would result in judicial accountability of judges. He
said, "At the establishment of our Constitutions, the judiciary bodies
were supposed to be the most helpless and harmless members of the
government. Experience, however, soon showed us in what way they were to
become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the means provided
for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office;
that their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass
silent and unheeded by the public at large; that these decisions,
nevertheless, become law by precedent, sapping little and little, the
foundations of the Constitution, before anyone perceived that invisible
and helpless worm had been busily employed in consuming its substance.
In truth, man is not made to be trusted for life, if secured against all
liability to account."
In the founding of our country, and in
the providence of God Almighty working in hearts of our Founding
Fathers, the revelation of J.A.I.L. was not yet to be revealed. But now
in this generation, God, according to the good pleasure of His will, has
chosen to reveal the concept of J.A.I.L. to this, and other nations.
Above I stated that J.A.I.L. was equally
as important as is the original Constitution itself. How so? you say. It
was Thomas Jefferson himself that expressed the lack of a means of
security of the very Constitution he had a part in writing, stating that
he feared the politically motivated Judiciary Industry would completely
undermine the Constitution until it became just a worthless piece of
paper.
Thomas Jefferson warned us as surely as
if it were printed in today's newspapers, "...the
Federal Judiciary; an irresponsible body (for impeachment is scarcely a
scare-crow), working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little
today and a little tomorrow, and advancing it's noiseless step like a
thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from
the States, and the government of all be consolidated into one. ... when
all government ... in little as in great things, shall be drawn to
Washington as the centre of all power, it will render powerless the
checks provided of one government on another and will become as venal
and oppressive as the government from which we separated."
-- Thomas Jefferson, 1821.
So, we arrive at the question, which is
of the greater value, the preservation of the principles of our original
Constitution, or the means by which it is protected? They are
inseparable, and neither can exist without the other. As a practical
matter, everyone should respect the existence of J.A.I.L. as if it were
authored by Thomas Jefferson himself, and I believe he would have been
delighted to have his name associated with it. I realize it is hard to
conceive of a document outside of the Constitution that is so important
as is our Constitution itself, but God has now brought to light the
revelation of J.A.I.L. to this nation, and calls upon America to support
it for its very future's sake.
There are many groups, organizations,
political parties, and coalitions with their own agendas
throughout America which pay little or no attention to J.A.I.L. This
does not concern me in the least, for I know by the Grace of God, one of
these days all these causes will have to reckon with the validity of the
value of J.A.I.L. being equal to that of our Constitution itself, and in
that day we will have the opportunity to move in unity for the
restitution of the government envisioned by Thomas Jefferson.
(Back)